2012 Data breaches Definition Government 
Krebs on Security
SEPTEMBER 26, 2024
The United States today unveiled sanctions and indictments against the alleged proprietor of Joker’s Stash , a now-defunct cybercrime store that peddled tens of millions of payment cards stolen in some of the largest data breaches of the past decade. Joker’s sold cards stolen in a steady drip of breaches at U.S.
Hunton Privacy
MAY 7, 2012
The Working Paper aims to reduce uncertainty regarding the definition of cloud computing and how the technology intersects with privacy, data protection and other legal issues.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
HL Chronicle of Data Protection
JUNE 17, 2019
On 6 June, 2019, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (the “ PCPD “) issued an enforcement notice against Cathay Pacific Airways (and its affiliate Hong Kong Dragon Airlines) (together, “ Cathay Pacific “) in respect of a data breach concerning unauthorized access to the personal data of some 9.4
Data Protection Report
FEBRUARY 27, 2019
To date, the largest fine the FTC had imposed on a tech giant for breaking an agreement with the government to safeguard consumers’ data was a US$22.5 million penalty settlement in 2012. review and roll out Master Service Agreements with restrictions for data use by service providers that are required under the CCPA. [1]
Hunton Privacy
OCTOBER 17, 2012
On October 15, 2012, the Singapore Parliament passed the Personal Data Protection Act 2012. The new law will apply only to data processing in the private sector as data processing by public agencies (or organizations acting on behalf of public agencies) are already subject to internal government rules.
Hunton Privacy
MARCH 2, 2015
“Personal data” is broadly defined under the Act as “any data … under the control of a covered entity, not otherwise generally available to the public through lawful means, and … linked, or as a practical matter linkable by the covered entity, to a specific individual, or linked to a device that is associated with or routinely used by an individual.”
Data Matters
SEPTEMBER 29, 2021
Although these proportionality factors began as an integral part of the definition of the scope of discovery, for more than two decades these limitations resided in a separate subsection of the Rule, resulting in considerable confusion and less-than-rigorous enforcement. 21 If it is not both relevant and proportional, it is not discoverable.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
235 
Let's personalize your content