This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
One of the consequences of the Scherms II decision is that EU organisations need to take greater care in determining how best to protect the flows of personaldata outside the EU. Data exports must cease when there are no additional safeguards that would ensure an “adequate level of protection.”
Met at the 6th National Pro Bono Conference in Ottawa in September 2016 Met on 15-17 October 2001 in Vancouver for the Luscar/Obed/Coal Valley arbitration. I communicated with multiple infosec journalists (one of whose own personaldata was also in the breach) and still, we got no closer. It feels like a CRM.
On June 14, 2013, the French Data Protection Authority (“CNIL”) announced that last March it had created an internal working group to study the privacy issues arising from the access of the personaldata of French citizens by foreign public authorities. In the CNIL’s view, the recent revelation of the U.S.
The CJEU’s long-awaited Schrems II decision of 16 July 2020, raised important questions on the validity of data processing activities involving the transfer of personaldata outside the EEA. Schrems II. More information on these recommendations can be found here. The EC’s Draft SCCs . The fact that several ( e.
The Council has proposed a number of changes to the Proposal issued by the Commission, including, inter alia , to strengthen the data protection provisions and incorporate certain of the recommendations in the Joint Opinion. What changes has the Council proposed? Which COVID-19 tests will be accepted for a test certificate?
The EDPS will contribute to initiatives that are likely to have implications on the protection of privacy and personaldata, such as the implementation of the Security Union agenda and the Action Plan of terrorist financing. Contribute to a Security Union and Stronger Borders Based on Respect for Fundamental Rights.
The Article 29 Working Party (“Working Party”) recently issued its Opinion on data processing at work (the “Opinion”). The Opinion considers data protection by design, data protection impact assessments and Article 88 with respect to processing employee data.
Today, the European Commission published the final Implementing Decision on standard contractual clauses (“ New SCCs ”) for the transfer of personaldata to third countries. The new SCCs will not apply for transfers of personaldata from the UK to a third country.
With respect to alternative data transfer mechanisms, the Position Paper concludes the following: Consent : The Position Paper notes that individuals must provide effective informed consent. According to the Position Paper, this entails providing individuals with comprehensive information on the lack of personaldata protection in the U.S.,
Enterprises are constantly scaling to meet growing customer needs—with an explosion of endpoints and data, it is becoming increasingly difficult to secure endpoints, and remote work has only added to the challenge. If our personaldata or confidential enterprise data falls into the wrong hands, bad actors could create havoc.
The EDPS is an independent regulatory body whose main goal is to ensure that the EU institutions and bodies abide by the principles of EU data protection law when they process personaldata and develop new policies.
Key takeaways from this survey include: 77% of the participating companies rely on SCCs to legitimize data transfers outside of the European Economic Area, 14% of the participants transfer personaldata based on the European Commission’s adequacy decisions (including the decision recognizing the EU-U.S.
While an agreement has been reached on the data protection reform “package,” entailing the EU General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) and the Directive for data protection in the police and justice sectors, the EDPS will continue to support European institutions in their process to create a coherent data protection framework in Europe.
In 2001, a bankruptcy order was made against the claimant, but this order was later rescinded. The claimant alleged that he failed to obtain credit for his business venture as a result of the inaccurate data on his Equifax record. Requirements of the UK Data Protection Act. Obligation to Ensure Accuracy of PersonalData.
On June 23, 2014, the Article 29 Working Party (the “Working Party”) published its Opinion 7/2014 on the protection of personaldata in Québec (the “Opinion”).
Since its establishment in 2001, the Centre has helped businesses, data protection authorities and consumer organizations rethink how to manage and protect personaldata in today’s information age. ”
While we’ve collectively wrung our hands about this for years (I started thinking about “ the Database of Intentions ” back in 2001, and I offered a “ Data Bill of Rights ” back in 2007), it was Europe, with its particular history and sensitivities, which finally took significant and definitive action.
On February 5, 2010, the European Commission adopted a new set of standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”) for transfers of personaldata from data controllers in the EU to data processors outside the EU. View the European Commission press release.
The Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of PersonalData (generally referred to as “Convention 108”), enacted in 1981, is the only legally-binding international treaty dealing with privacy and data protection.
“When Spain incorporated the directive into their law, one noticeable change [from other EU countries] was the lack of legitimate interest for a basis for processing personaldata,” Tobón said. Unlike GDPR, POPIA asserts companies also have “personaldata” that requires protection.
Also in January, the ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) fined Carphone Warehouse £400,000 – one of the largest fines it issued under the DPA (Data Protection Act) 1998 – for multiple security inadequacies that led to a 2015 data breach in which three million customers’ personaldata was compromised. I’m sorry, Dave.
She also oversaw the introduction of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in January 2001, for which the Commissioner’s office became responsible. The name of the office was changed to its current name (the ICO) in 2001. France oversaw significant changes in the law as the 1998 Act was significantly more stringent than the 1984 Act.
Although the possibility of recasting the Proposed Regulation as a directive remains, the Presidency’s amendments emphasize that differing levels of data protection within the European Union must not impede the free flow of personaldata within the Union (Recital 11). Scope of the Proposed Regulation.
One of the most disconcerting areas of divergence between EU Member States is the different national positions on whether patient consent is a valid legal ground for processing personaldata in clinical trials. This means that requirements in the GDPR relating to consent do NOT apply to health and care research.”
While we’ve collectively wrung our hands about this for years (I started thinking about “ the Database of Intentions ” back in 2001, and I offered a “ Data Bill of Rights ” back in 2007), it was Europe, with its particular history and sensitivities, which finally took significant and definitive action.
These measures should include a combination of data security controls, audits, data breach response planning, developing appropriate data protection policies and procedures and training of employees, particularly those who come into contact with personaldata in their day-to-day roles. 1 [2016] UKSC 11.
While we’ve collectively wrung our hands about this for years (I started thinking about “ the Database of Intentions ” back in 2001, and I offered a “ Data Bill of Rights ” back in 2007), it was Europe, with its particular history and sensitivities, which finally took significant and definitive action.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 55,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content